There are several paths a family may choose to take based on their situation, such as negotiated agreement, mediation, collaborative law, or litigation. We partner with families to understand each option, the pros and cons, the risks and the benefits, before moving forward.
The videos below provide additional information.
Even couples who agree to divorce amicably often need help resolving difficult financial and child custody issues. In collaborative divorce, each party is guided to an informed agreement by professionals experienced in the process. Having an advocate for the fair settlement of all issues can lead to a more satisfactory settlement to both parties and less emotional strife.
The mediator is a neutral while in a collaborative divorce each party as his/her own counsel whose role is to represent only his or her client. The collaboratively trained attorney provide legal advice to the parties, where the mediator cannot.
Collaborative divorce is often less expensive because the parties and their attorneys work in a productive, forward focused manner, which is not necessarily the case in an adversarial process. The emotional costs are lower as well.
Generally, yes. However, the collaborative attorney will assess with his or her client as to the appropriateness of the process.
If the parties terminate the process, they can choose another method of resolution. However, the collaborative attorneys cannot represent the client in a contested litigation.
My counsel did a good job of helping me feel that she viewed my case as 'important' and she provided good advice.
Evening and weekend appointments are available under certain circumstances.
Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions
Site design and development by Cat's Eye Design
